Animal Sex | The Ashford Zone

Locally-located, politically syndicated, two-time public office loser Nathan Tabor is mad at "the gay" again. Even when it is gay animals.

Another Liberal Fairy Tale

By Nathan Tabor

The nation of Norway has now given us the first museum exhibition that claims that the birds, the bees, and other animals may be homosexuals.

The Oslo Natural History Museum exhibit is just one more example of propaganda invading the scientific world. Based on its assessment of same-sex attraction in the animal kingdom, the museum draws the conclusion that homosexuality cannot be considered “unnatural.”

Please, Nathan. Have the balls to take a stand. The curator of the exhibit, Geir Soeli, told Reuters: "Homosexuality has been observed for more than 1500 animal species, and is well documented for 500 of them."

Now, is this "propaganda" or is it science, Nathan? If you have evidence to suggest that homosexuality has never occured in the animal species, come right out and say so.

The exhibit’s project leader, Geir Soeli, was quoted as saying, “The sexual urge is strong in all animals…It’s a part of life, it’s fun to have sex,” Soeli made this statement in trying to explain the bizarre conclusion that homosexuality is rampant among animals.

Well, actually, all Geir was saying was that it exists among animals — not that it is "rampant". Nice strawman, though.

In one exhibit, two stuffed female swans are depicted on a nest—a clear effort to promote the “Heather Has Two Mommies” school of thought.

Well, I doubt they have "Heather Has Two Mommies" in Norway, but that’s beside the point.

But let’s get real. Is it totally outsidew the realm of possibility that two females might tend to an egg?

Meanwhile, a photograph shows a male giraffe mounting another giraffe—supposedly in expectation of sex.

Um. Why else would a male giraffe mount another male giraffe? I mean, think about it, Nathan. Is there any other explanation for why it happens …or are you suggesting that it doesn’t happen?

There would seem to be a clear political reason for this kind of exhibition. In some countries, laws are on the books which call homosexuality a “crime against nature.” One Reuters report conceded that researchers haven’t paid much attention to animal homosexuality. The Reuters report concludes the disinterest might be the result of
“distaste, lack of interest or fear or ridicule.”

I imagine that’s probably why.

But perhaps the real reason for the disinterest is because it doesn’t pass the laugh test. If homosexuality were truly strong in the animal kingdom, there would be no animals left, since they would be unable and unwilling to reproduce.

Ha hah ha ha! By that logic, Nathan, you must conceed that homosexuality doesn’t exist in the human kingdom, for just the same reasons.

As the Reuters report points out, homosexuality would seem to be a genetic dead-end.

Yes — the operative word being "seem". The Reuters report goes on to say (and Nathan omits):

Among theories, males can sometimes win greater acceptance in a pack by having homosexual contact. That in turn can help their chances of later mating with females, he said.

And a study of homosexual men in Italy suggested that their mothers and sisters had more offspring. "The same genes that give homosexuality in men could give higher fertility among women," he said.

Forgot to write about that, huh, Nathan?

Soeli claims that bonobos, a type of chimpanzee, are all bisexuals. This is significant, because those who believe in evolution rather than in intelligent design can then make the case that we humans must all have bisexual tendencies too, since, in their view, we’re all descended from apes.

No, Nathan. Nobody is making that case, because it’s shitty logic. After all, all chimpanzees love bananas, but all humans don’t. You’re a moron.

For years, homosexual activists have tried to make the case that there’s a special homosexual gene hiding in the gene pool.

No, they haven’t. Name one homosexual activist who made that case.

Yet, that simply doesn’t explain why one human twin might pursue a homosexual lifestyle and another would not.

Wow. You killed the strawman.

The trouble with museum exhibits like this one is that they try to sell children on the idea that homosexual sex is not an aberration—a claim that can lead to justification of same sex marriage.

And the Holocaust museum teaches us that there is such a thing as Jews, and that can lead to a justification of interreligious marriage.

With liberals such as these running scientific exhibits and some schools, we can fully expect a version of the beloved storybook “The Three Little Pigs” to give rise to “The Three Gay Pigs.”

You can? You’re paranoid, dude.