Sally Yates is a career civil servant in the Justice Department. She was hired under the first Bush administration, promoted during the Clinton administration, promoted again during the second Bush administration, and yet again under the Obama administration. Two years ago she was named deputy attorney general, the second ranking position in the department, and then became acting attorney general when Loretta Lynch left. President Trump asked her to stay on until Jeff Sessions was confirmed, and she agreed. A few days later, after declining to defend Trump’s immigration order in court, she was fired.
Today she’s scheduled to testify about what she told the White House regarding National Security Advisor Mike Flynn’s connections to Russia.
And the President seems concerned.
Let me ask YOU Donald Trump why you hired Flynn (and fired Yates) after Yates told you he was a security risk. Are you THAT stupid? https://t.co/4iEzYsQQWx
— Ken Ashford (@KenAshford) May 8, 2017
Also, he doesn’t know how to spell “council”.
It is odd that Trump is inserting himself into this hearing. It shows he is concerned.
There are two things big about this hearing this afternoon in which Sally Yates will give public testimony.
The first is… this is the Senate. The responsible house of Congress. Hopefully, we will see less show-boating and more seriousness.
The second is… Flynn. The stories are pouring out today. According to NBC, former President Obama informed Trump personally not to hire Flynn.
That piece of news late this morning made Trump’s earlier tweet today come off badly:
General Flynn was given the highest security clearance by the Obama Administration – but the Fake News seldom likes talking about that.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 8, 2017
The Trump team has confirmed this but responds that they thought Obama said it in “jest” (Obama being the prankster that he is — not!)
Trump, is seems, has a blind spot for Flynn. According to Axios, the White House staff wants to throw Flynn under a bus but Trump will not have any of it.
Which brings us back to Sally Yates. Her testimony could raise new questions about how President Trump responded to concerns that Flynn had lied. And one hopes she can shed light on the links between Trump’s campaign and Russia (although I suspect not).
To be updated….
UPDATE 1:30 pm – Hmmmmmm….
Hill Sources: White House contacted multiple GOP Senators TODAY asking them to cancel Yates hearing#SallyYatesIsAPatriot #SallyYates
— Scott Dworkin (@funder) May 8, 2017
They really seem worried.
UPDATE 2:35 pm – Yates hearing starts. Her and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper
So Clapper confirms what Comey said: Russians did collect info from GOP groups but (for some reason) never weaponized this material.
— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) May 8, 2017
Q: Do you have evidence of collusion between Trump campaign & Russians?
Yates: I can’t answer that without revealing classified information pic.twitter.com/7NCsaMKquO
— Bradd Jaffy (@BraddJaffy) May 8, 2017
Senator Graham steers the conversation with Yates back to unmasking topic.
New Yates testimony, bottom line:
– We warned WH Flynn was being “untrue”
– Flynn’s “underlying conduct” problematic
– Showed why we knew— Ari Melber (@AriMelber) May 8, 2017
Woah: “The Russians also knew Gen. Flynn had misled the American people and others….that created a compromised situation.”
— Jenna McLaughlin (@JennaMC_Laugh) May 8, 2017
In answer to Trump’s tweet, both Yates and Clapper, under oath, said they do not know who or how the info was leaked.
Yates says Flynn talked to the FBI without a lawyer, and made untrue statements about his dealings with Russia. Wow.
— Ari Melber (@AriMelber) May 8, 2017
OH MY GOD….. This:
Yates: White House counsel’s reaction to learning that Flynn lied: why should Justice Dept care if one White House official lies to another?
— Dafna Linzer (@DafnaLinzer) May 8, 2017
Sally Yates: “To state the obvious, you don’t want your national security adviser compromised by the Russians.” pic.twitter.com/mtRfJcNBZg
— Bradd Jaffy (@BraddJaffy) May 8, 2017
Yates reminds us that her last day at the DOJ was the day she told the White House they can come review damning evidence about Flynn’s compromised position. Boom you are fired
We’re coming up on one hour and I am embarrassed at the Republicans like Graham and Grassley who seen non-plussed by the fact that the national Security Adviser was a security risk because the Russians knew he was lying. They only care about leaks/unmasking.
And they’re lying about it.
Grassley claiming falsely that DNC did not cooperate with FBI re Russia cyber-penetration.
— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) May 8, 2017
Bombshell: Clapper confirms multiple foreign allies of the US shared comms btw Trump advisors & Russians. Says issue is “quite sensitive.”
— Just Security (@just_security) May 8, 2017
BOTTOM LINE https://t.co/JBybx1vFPK
— Lizz Resistead (@lizzwinstead) May 8, 2017
Cornyn joins other GOP senators to ask about unmasking. There doesn’t seem to be any criminal wrongdoing, just a general “concern”. Seems to me that the top national security adviser being compromised by Russia and the White House doing nothing about it, is the bigger fish here.
When Don McGahn asked how Flynn did in his FBI interview, Sally Yates declined to answer. That cannot be good news for Gen. Flynn.
— Ken Dilanian (@KenDilanianNBC) May 8, 2017
Fascinating exchange: Cornyn goes after Yates for her failure to support Trump’s Muslim ban. She humiliates him by saying that the ban was unlawful, so she couldn’t. In follow-up, she acknowledges that three courts have agreed with her.
“What is your authority to overrule the Office of Legal Counsel?” – Cornyn
“Well, I was the Attorney General of the United States.” – Yates
— Craig Harrington (@Craigipedia) May 8, 2017
All this is timely because at this exact moment, the 4th Circuit is hearing arguments on Muslim ban.
Ted Cruz is up now.
Ted Cruz is going after Huma Abedin. Seriously, he really is. #SallyYates
— (((Garrett Epps))) (@Profepps) May 8, 2017
Cruz – back to a line of questioning on the leaks at the
Yates/Clapper hearing— Maggie Jordan: (@MaggieJordanACN) May 8, 2017
And she beats him with the same stick.
Sally Yates just shut down Ted Cruz on Constitutional Law. pic.twitter.com/ONlwEYm64D
— jordan 🌹 (@JordanUhl) May 8, 2017
Yates is just brutal. I would suggest GOP senators stop playing gotcha. She is running rings around them.
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2017
Yates says she can’t say which federal laws were implicated in their investigation, bc that could give away the underlying conduct.
— Ari Melber (@AriMelber) May 8, 2017
Aaaaaand they are back to the Muslim/travel ban with Sen. Kennedy (R-La) mansplaining to Yates.
“Have you ever leaked unclassified information?” LOL “Unclassified information” also known as information” LOL
— Lizz Resistead (@lizzwinstead) May 8, 2017
As Republicans senators question why Yates refused to defend Trump’s executive order, Senator Leahy reminds them that many of those same Republicans, at her confirmation hearing, wanted to know is she could act independent of the President, and she said yes (to their pleasure)
Here's a clip of the Sessions-Yates exchange from March 2015 that Leahy just brought up at the Russia hearing. https://t.co/Xkt20ZyLGO
— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) May 8, 2017