2:30 today.
The thing to remember is that Sessions WANTED this testimony. So this is likely to his benefit. Or Trump’s.
Sessions was once on the periphery of the Trump-Russia scandal. I mean, sure, he failed to disclose at his confirmation hearings that he met with the Russians twice during the campaign. But he fixed that as soon as the Washington Post reported it.
But now there are reports of a third meeting with the Russians. He will be asked about that.
He will be asked to confirm or deny Comey’s testimony — like, did Trump clear the room to talk to Comey alone (as Comey testified). If he directly contradicts Comey’s testimony, that will be the big story coming out of the hearing today.
He will be asked about Comey’s firing and why he was involved in it. He shouldn’t have been if he had recused himself.
The open question is whether or not Sessions will assert executive privilege relating to the Comey stuff. And even THAT is problematic for several reasons. First of all, it is the President’s privilege to assert; Sessions cannot assert it for himself or on the President’s behalf. Has he gotten guidance from the President (or the President’s lawyers) on this? Last week, Deputy AG Robinson tried to assert executive privilege even though the President never gave it with respect to their testimony.
And even if the President asserted executive privilege with respect to his private conversations with Comey, he waived much of that privilege with his tweets, so it is questionable to what extent the privilege exists at all. Of course, that fight won’t be resolved in the hearing today, so Sessions can assert the privilege all he wants, they will fight about it, but in the end, he can refuse to testify. I don’t think they will try to hold him in contempt of Congress.
So that’s what will happen today. I don’t expect bombshells.
My advice today: focus 10% of your attention/outrage on Sessions testimony, 90% on the secret health care bill that is speeding to a vote.
— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) June 13, 2017