People will remember today as they remember say John Dean’s testimony. It’s a historic moment. Kind of fun to take a breath and register that.
— Harry Litman (@harrylitman) November 20, 2019
Yup.
Is there a mercy rule for congressional hearings?
— Justin Amash (@justinamash) November 20, 2019
Nope.
It’s over.
— Anand Giridharadas (@AnandWrites) November 20, 2019
Gordon Sondland’s devastating testimony must end the Trump presidency.
But that’s not all. It is now plausible that Vice President Pence should face an impeachment inquiry as well.
And Mike Pompeo.
Nunes’ opening statement seemed like he was not aware of Sondland’s opening statement to come. At one point in his statement, Nunes warned Sondland that he was about to be “smeared,” apparently referring to Democrats. After Sondland’s opening statement, many suggested that Nunes’ prediction was misdirected.
“Yeah, the reaction I’m getting from everybody on the Hill right now, replied Playboy Washington correspondent Alex Thomas, “is ‘Nunes read the wrong opening statement.’”
Sondland is destroying virtually every Trump defense: Trump didn’t care about Ukraine; there was a quid pro quo; Trump & Rudy demanded the announcement of investigations; everyone was in the loop; Ukraine knew about the linkage; all was directed by Trump
— Preet Bharara (@PreetBharara) November 20, 2019
Sondland: There was a quid pro quo. pic.twitter.com/CD1yqAM56j
— Shane Harris (@shaneharris) November 20, 2019
Oh my god. Nunes’ face moments ago. pic.twitter.com/Mku0P491cE
— John Aravosis (@aravosis) November 20, 2019
And now we’re on break.
“Republicans are not commenting yet,” Manu Raju says, before turning to Schiff’s characterization of the testimony as hugely significant.
— southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) November 20, 2019
Shifty Schiff thinks he hasn’t gotten enough camera time. So during a brief break, he’s doing a press conference.
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) November 20, 2019
New hoax. Same swamp.
Ken Starr on FOX News wondering out loud if it’s time for GOP Senators to make a trip to the White House. This may now be on the fast track.
— Cheri Jacobus (@CheriJacobus) November 20, 2019
THEY’VE LOST KEN STARR https://t.co/p4ViBFCQjZ
— Judd Legum (@JuddLegum) November 20, 2019
We’re back. Nunes is taking the position that Trump was acting on the belief that Ukraine was “out to get him”
Sounds like @DevinNunes is now laying foundation to say @realDonaldTrump had reason to hold up access and $$. That’s a possible explanation, only POTUS has not himself offered it.
— Michael Smerconish (@smerconish) November 20, 2019
Nunes: AMBASSADOR SONDLAND ARE YOU AWARE OF ALL THE DIPSHIT CONSPIRACY THEORIES RATTLING AROUND IN MY BIG DUMB EMPTY MEDIOCRE HEAD
— Jeff Tiedrich (@itsJeffTiedrich) November 20, 2019
Sondland: I am not
Nunes: AHA
Deep State. Never Trumpers. Conspiracy theories. Whistleblower. This is all the Republicans have in response to Sondland’s devastating testimony. This is a terrible day for them and Trump. His defense now rests on wild debunked conspiracy theories.
Sondland notes that Trump had laid the Burisma quid pro quo much earlier than the July 25 call, debunking Nunes’ line, but Nunes takes that as an invitation to go after Hunter Biden.
GOP counsel Castor now questioning.
GOP counsel gesturing at a potential defense — just b/c Trump *says* someone will do something (Giuliani) doesn’t mean they will do it (Lewandowski, Barr).
— Ari Melber (@AriMelber) November 20, 2019
Mueller found Lewandowski heard and ignored Trump request to press Sessions, Barr denies role from Ukraine call (tbd)
Sondland closes hole he left open for GOP. How did you know if POTUS never told you about aid? Answer: Because he told me talk to Giuliani and Giuliani made Trump’s interests clear.
Meanwhile…
Trump took no questions from reporters this morning upon his departure to Texas. He made some of his own comments about Sondland, carrying handwritten notes about the hearing. Quotes to follow.
— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) November 20, 2019
That was the second page he flips to. He says it’s his response to Sondland. First is below. (And I’m assuming the very talented still photographers in the White House press corps got better shots than my iPhone did.) POTUS did not answer any questions – he’s now on his way to TX pic.twitter.com/MzdHAw8aF4
— Hallie Jackson (@HallieJackson) November 20, 2019
Did he write “I want nothing” twice at the top of the note? This is really weird. pic.twitter.com/MuRd1krNgr
— D. M. Candiru (@DoctorCandiru) November 20, 2019
Did he write “I want nothing” twice at the top of the note? This is really weird. pic.twitter.com/MuRd1krNgr
— D. M. Candiru (@DoctorCandiru) November 20, 2019
The rats are turning on each other: pic.twitter.com/tOvFzpIwUV
— Greg Sargent (@ThePlumLineGS) November 20, 2019
Sondland not giving Republicans much to work with here: pic.twitter.com/aDUZ5PIGp6
— Shane Harris (@shaneharris) November 20, 2019
Rudy weighs in, in real time:
During the July 24 conversation @realDonaldTrump agrees to a meeting with Pres. Zelensky without requiring an investigation, any discussion of military aid or any condition whatsoever.
— Rudy Giuliani (@RudyGiuliani) November 20, 2019
This record shows definitively no quid pro quo, which is the same as no bribery. END OF CASE!
(The phone call was on July 25)
Counterpoint: Today is November 20th and Zelensky still hasn’t had a White House meeting. https://t.co/GSdf34hmO5
— Garrett Haake (@GarrettHaake) November 20, 2019
Wait, wut???
Whoa, whoa, whoa. “Given [Trump’s] business dealings” in Ukraine, he understood corruption? The fuck?
— The Rude Pundit (@rudepundit) November 20, 2019
Chutzpah is Devin Nunes complaining that he can’t interview witnesses, after the White House refused access to all of these witnesses. It is also Steve Castor arguing that Sondland’s recollection is unreliable because he lacks access to documents the administration has withheld.
Castor helpfully brought up that other companies, like Ukranian company Naftogaz, came up in discussions about corruption. Sondland ageed. Yet the Ukranians were asked to only investigate one company, Burisma, in exchange for White House meeting. Why? To smear Biden.
On August 10, Sondland and a Ukrainian official coordinated a statement announcing Trump’s desired investigation.
— The Moscow Project (@moscow_project) November 20, 2019
Sondland then reached out to Pompeo, explicitly laying out that he thought it would now be enough to get Zelensky a White House meeting. pic.twitter.com/L9CP09328r
More real-time input fro Rudy:
Giuliani weighing in mid-testimony. (This rather dramatically undercuts any arguments that he has a privilege against testifying beyond the normal right to plead the fifth.) https://t.co/NYqosRROzM
— Susan Hennessey (@Susan_Hennessey) November 20, 2019
There’s your extortion: Ambassador Sondland says in no uncertain terms that a White House meeting with Ukraine’s president was delayed specifically to pressure Ukraine into announcing an investigation of the Bidens/Burisma.#ImpeachmentHearing
— Max Burns (@themaxburns) November 20, 2019
Goldman (Dem counsel) is carefully laying out that other witnesses (Taylor and Morrison) make it clear the quid pro quo came directly from Trump, not Rudy.
Castor making the point that Holmes was energized by the July 26 call…
— Jeremy Herb (@jeremyherb) November 20, 2019
“So not only did I buy him lunch, I provided him entertainment,” Sondland says.
Now we’re getting into the substance of whether Sondland “brought up the Bidens.”
Wow. In response to *GOP* questioning, Sondland again laments how his boss Pres. Trump is defying congressional request for admin evidence that could answer these questions truthfully and more thoroughly.
— Ari Melber (@AriMelber) November 20, 2019
Nunes argues there is a shift from “quid pro quo” to bribery to extortion.
— Ari Melber (@AriMelber) November 20, 2019
Legally this is inaccurate.
Bribery & extortion are basically legal categories, quid pro quo falls under them as a #type of bribery exchange.
(QPQ is not the only type of bribery in Constitution or law)
Castor is much more animated in his questioning of Sondland than any other previous witness. Getting a little testy.
— Josh Kraushaar (@HotlineJosh) November 20, 2019
Perry follows Pence in denial:
Just In: Energy Department issues new statement that accuses Sondland of misrepresenting Perry’s role. pic.twitter.com/VXpxn0aPht
— Ari Natter (@AriNatter) November 20, 2019
And we’re on break again.
It seems to me that the GOP who are running defense for Trump have only one defense: that there was no connection between the investigation of Burisma and the investigation of Bidens. Certainly, that is the position of Volker and Sondland. But Trump made the connection himself, not only in the July 25 phone call, but in numerous tweets. Maybe Volker and Sondland never made the Burisma-Biden connection, but Trump sure did.
Chris Wallace says it’s “incredible” that Sondland & Volker wouldn’t connect the dots sooner, failed to ask themselves the obvious: “Why would the president be asking for an investigation of one particular company in Ukraine?”
— Eli Stokols (@EliStokols) November 20, 2019
Jeffry Toobin: “This is the most consequential day of Donald Trump’s presidency… the president of the United States orchestrated it…I don’t think after this testimony there can be any doubt that this exchange took place: campaign dirt for…a meeting with the president.”
All roads to the dirty Ukraine deal lead TO Giuliani but only one road leads FROM Giuliani. That one road leads to Trump. And Rudy has said publicly he only does things on behalf of the president. So Giuliani’s goose is cooked. If Giuliani wants to avoid prison, be better flip.
— Glenn Kirschner (@glennkirschner2) November 20, 2019
On break again.
Now deleted, but preserving for posterity pic.twitter.com/DyYOFy03Za
— Andrew Prokop (@awprokop) November 20, 2019
After Fox News contributors Andy McCarthy and Ken Starr try to put a positive GOP spin on Sondland’s testimony, Chris Wallace blows it all up:
— Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) November 20, 2019
They “are very good lawyers and “can parse this” any way they want but we already got our headline from this – there was a quid pro quo. pic.twitter.com/ys3iTuJsHf
Rudy again:
Republican lawyer doesn’t do his own research and preparation, and is instead picking up Democrat lies, shame.
— Rudy Giuliani (@RudyGiuliani) November 20, 2019
Allow me to inform him: I have NO financial interests in Ukraine, NONE! I would appreciate his apology.
You should come before the committee and explain it all, Rudy!
But Rudy’s tweet is an example of how they are turning on each other.
Rudy wants you to know that the activities paid for by a mobbed up oligarch that he’s been engaged in with his indicted business partners Parnas and Fruman don’t amount to business in Ukraine.
And we’re back:
SCHIFF: We’ve had a lot of argumentation here, ‘well, the Ukrainians didn’t know the aid was withheld’, but the Ukrainians found out and then it was made abundantly clear … if they wanted that aid, they were going to have to make these statements, correct?
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) November 20, 2019
SONDLAND: Correct.
We are in 5 minute BS rounds now.
Trump just now:
Impeachment Witch Hunt is now OVER! Ambassador Sondland asks U.S. President (me): “What do you want from Ukraine? I keep hearing all these different ideas & theories. What do you want? It was a very abrupt conversation. He was not in a good mood. He (the President) just said,”…
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 20, 2019
I WANT NOTHING! pic.twitter.com/KKUfwSIRAi
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 20, 2019
It’s the “me” after U.S. President that makes this gold.
But wanting nothing? Pretty clear from the July 25 phone call that you wanted them to investigate Biden.
Trump: “I want nothing!”
Also Trump: “I would like you to do us a favor though…”
Gym Jordan yelling now.
DID THE MEETING THAT DIDN’T HAPPEN HAPPEN? DID THAT ANNOUNCEMENT THAT DIDN’T HAPPEN HAPPEN? HEY Y’ALL REMEMBER THIS WHEN THE CALL CAME OUT EVERYONE SAID WE’RE GONNA QUID PRO QUO NONE OF THAT HAPPENED EVERYBODY SAID THIS IS SCARY NONE OF THAT MATERIALIZED ….
— Kevin M. Kruse (@KevinMKruse) November 20, 2019
I yield back.
The Jordan line here is now familiar: because the plot was discovered and called off it doesn’t count.
Sondland: I’ve said repeatedly, Congressman, I was presuming.
— emptywheel (@emptywheel) November 20, 2019
Turner: No one on this planet told you that Trump was tying aid to investigations.
Sondland got pretty pissed when Turner started accusing him of makeup testimony.
BILL TAYLOR: “As I said on the phone, I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.” https://t.co/bCYW3MgChi
— southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) November 20, 2019
This seems exactly right. Trump was cranky and said no QPQ in his call with Sondland because at that point the whistleblower complaint had come to light and he knew he was caught. https://t.co/k4DjhtppdM
— Philip Klinkner (@pklinkne) November 20, 2019
Trump’s denail comes after the whistleblower complaint has been circulating which is accusing him, accurately, of a quid pro quo. Saying “I’m not robbing a bank” when the cops show up to find you with a gun out at the bank is not exactly dispositive proof of innocence.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) November 20, 2019
People committing crimes rarely bust themselves by announcing them, aka confessing, in real time.
Schiff, repeating GOP claims, they got the money. Yes, they got caught.
Schiff, they made no statement, they got no meeting. [Correcting Jordan]— emptywheel (@emptywheel) November 20, 2019
Rep Wenstrump accuses Schiff of participating in a “coup attempt” against President Trump including the DNC, FBI, DOJ and “foreign sources”. pic.twitter.com/6djlQIh87Y
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) November 20, 2019
For the record, I’ve met with Ukrainian intel and leaders. There is no way they did not understand the need to do what Trump wanted as expressed in the Perfect Call in order to get military assistance.
— Steven L. Hall (@StevenLHall1) November 20, 2019
Speier: Somewhat struck that you’re talking about bullying to get something done when all we’re talking about is bullying to get something done.
— emptywheel (@emptywheel) November 20, 2019
The flaw in the Republican argument that the U.S. often withholds foreign aid & this Ukraine hold is nothing special is that all those instances GOP Chris Stewart just mentioned were publicly announced. The Ukraine hold was secret. And it came after U.S. ambassador was recalled
— John Bresnahan (@BresPolitico) November 20, 2019
Per Elise Stefanik’s questioning, I would also add that (a) the aid was released only AFTER the IG report was sent to the House Intel Committee, & that (b) President Zelensky canceled his announcement of investigations into the Bidens only AFTER those events transpired… https://t.co/plq8XVvxcF
— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) November 20, 2019
Rep. Jordan keeps going back to the argument that Ukraine got the aid, so no harm, no foul.
— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) November 20, 2019
This is like how if I shoot at someone and miss, it’s totally cool. No harm, no foul. That’s the law, man.
Again, Republicans really do think their voters are stupid.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e8a5/7e8a57d0d6b8cef69b5410bbf8bbd57c18e8b75a" alt=""
Hmmm. Pompeo is denying something Sondland never said.
Schiff closes: The answer to the question, who was refusing the meeting with Zelensky … who was the one standing in the way of that meeting? Who was the one refusing to take that meeting? There’s only one answer to that question: And it’s Donald J. Trump. 45th president of the U.S.
Schiff ends by building on his closing remarks from last night: “Getting caught is no defense. Not to a violation of the Constitution. Or to a violation of his oath of office. And it certainly doesn’t give us a reason to ignore our own oath of office. We are adjourned.”
Schiff gets applause