Space Is Really Really Big

Ken AshfordGodstuff, Science & TechnologyLeave a Comment

Space is in the news lately, because of the release of the first photographs of another planetary system.  We've been aware of other planets outside the Solar system for quite some time, but we only know about them because we are able to see their effects (kind of like looking at the wave of a speedboat traveling on the water to determine that the speedboat in fact exists).

But now…

For the first time, astronomers have taken a visual image of a multiple-planet solar system beyond our own.

Using the Gemini North telescope and the W. M. Keck Observatoryon Hawaii's Mauna Kea, researchers observed in infrared light three planets orbiting around a star about 130 light-years away from Earth, called HR 8799. The discovery, published today in Science Express, is a step forward in the hunt for planets, and life, beyond Earth.

The alien system is supersized compared to our own: All three planets are gas giants, weighing roughly 10, 10 and 7 times the mass of Jupiter, circling a parent star 1.5 times the mass of our sun, and 5 times as bright. The giant bodies (two of which are pictured above) are orbiting at roughly 25, 40, and 70 times the distance between Earth and our sun. If there are Earth-sized planets present, they are too small to see with current technology.

Firstsolarsystem 

That's pretty cool, but what is also circulating around, not that the Hubble is being operational once again, is this photo of a galaxy cluster taken by the Hubble telescope:

2008_11_05t130258_450x448_us_space_darkmatter 

That, my friends, is a cluster of galaxies, each one (like our Milky Way galaxy) containing hundreds of billions of stars.

Our own Milky Way is in a galaxy cluster of 40 galaxies.

And there are hundreds of galaxy clusters that was know of.

So we're talking about an astronomical (heh) number of galaxies in the entire universe.  And since each galaxy contains hundreds of billions of stars, that means — how many stars?

And when you think about planets surrounding those stars?

My point here is that space is really really big, and to think that God created the Earth first, and then the heavens is egocentric, vain and ignorant.

Peter Schiff Was Right

Ken AshfordEconomy & Jobs & DeficitLeave a Comment

Peter Schiff is president of Euro Pacific Capital, Inc, a brokerage firm in Darien Connecticut.

In an August 2006 interview Schiff generated much controversy when he repeated his long-held investment thesis:  "The United States economy is like the Titanic and I am here with the lifeboat trying to get people to leave the ship …I see a real financial crisis coming for the United States."

On May 16, 2006 in debate on Fox News, Schiff accurately had forecast that the U.S. housing market was a bubble that would soon come to bust.

On December 13, 2007 in a Bloomberg interview on the show Open Exchange, Schiff further added that he felt that the crisis would extend to the credit card lending industry.

What's remarkable about this montage of video clips of Peter Schiff from 2006 and 2007 is how the other talking heads just laugh openly at Schiff's predictions.

I also happen to agree with Schiff in his assessment that the current recession is not a problem, but a solution to this country's bad habits of borrowing and spending on bad credit.  It's a necessary, albeit prolonged and painful, correction – kind of like the olden days, when they innoculated you from smallpox by infecting you with a little bit of smallpox.  The cure was painful, but it was necessary to prevent the disease from really getting you.

Hillary As Secretary of State?

Ken AshfordObama & AdministrationLeave a Comment

She's apparently being considered.

I think it is a great choice.  The Clintons are still admired abroad, and it will help the United States get back some of its international esteem that it has lost.  She has celebrity and credibility.

I don't agree with Mike Allen's assessment that Obama is on his way (with Clinton as SoS) to creating a "team of rivals" a la Lincoln's cabinet.  I think that is overstating it.

First of all, I'm not sure Clinton counts as a "rival" anymore. 

In any event, she's not as vehemently anti-Obama as many of Lincoln's cabinet were anti-Lincoln.

I think it is also a good move for Hillary's career.  It places her more front-and-center.

But I still say she should hold out for a seat on the Supreme Court.  She would be a great replacement for Ginsberg.

Hillary's replacement in the Senate would be decided by David Paterson, New York's Democratic governor.  I think Bill Clinton woold be an interesting choice, assuming he would take the position.

There's precedent for it: Andrew Johnson returned to the Senate after being impeached as President.

Okay, I Think I’m Done Tweaking The Blog Design Now

Ken AshfordBlogging3 Comments

Fixed some of the annoying things, like things being centered all the time.  Learned a lot about CSS in the process.

Comments are now in descending order (earliest comment first).

Added a search engine somewhere in there.

Took out Heather's Hangman (among other things), because Heather's gone AWOL with her new baby and shit so, you know, screw her.

Obviously a new look.

Load time seems better, if only marginally.

Of course, your browser experience may vary, so if something looks askew to you, or if you have a suggestion or peeve (pet or otherwise), let me know in the comments to this post.

UPDATE:  Okay.  Added a tagline randomizer, too.  Wasn't as hard as I thought it would be.  Now I just need more taglines….

The 63 Questions

Ken AshfordObama & AdministrationLeave a Comment

Want a job with the Obama administration?

Sure, who doesn't?

But you have to answer these 63 questions (PDF format).  Yes, those are the actual questions (and requests for information) that the Obama administration seeks.  The one drawing a lot of attention is the request for URLs of Facebook, MySpace, and personal blogs.

Well, I'm screwed.

UPDATE:  No, dammit, I'm not screwed.  What exactly have I put on this blog that would disqualify me from federal office?  It's not like I was in Debbie Does Dallas or anything….. oh, wait…..

Begich Pulls Ahead

Ken AshfordElection 2008Leave a Comment

No, the election isn't over.  There's still afight for the Senate, with Dems trying to get as close to a filibuster-proof majority of 60 as possible.

For some inexplicable reason, Ted Stevens (R-Convicted Felon-AK) trounced his Democratic challenger in Alaska, but that was before they counted absentee and early ballots.

And Begich has pulled ahead.

Behind The Scenes At “The Daily Show”

Ken AshfordPopular CultureLeave a Comment

Good article in the New York Times about how TDS is put together everyday. 

Here's the typical daily routine:

7 a.m.: About seven or eight producers start work, culling through video footage and material from the previous day, much of which is stored on a set of 15 to 20 TiVo digital-video recorders. Adam Lowitt, a producer who manages the studio production department, which keeps track of the footage, said that time is spent “gathering and finding these great gems that hopefully we can get on the show.”

Staff members will have e-mailed one another other the previous day about tidbits they saw on television and their approximate timestamps, as well as other ideas. Many of the most biting pairings footage were said to be the work of Adam Chodikoff, a researcher and “unsung hero” of the show, who was sitting in the audience. When asked if he watched a lot of television when he was a child, he replied, “The Brady Bunch.”

9 a.m.: Free breakfast (bagels from H & H, not Lenders). Then the staff member have their morning meeting, with the tidbits that have been pulled out by a rolling cast of writers, producers, graphics and researchers — many of whom have been working on ideas since the previous day, as news breaks. “We get specific about what angles we’ll be taking and we’ve all agreed to,” said Mr. Havlan, who has been working on the show since 1996. “We’re joking around from 9 to 10. Jokes from 9 to 10 frequently end up on the show.”

Jon Stewart sometimes joins in at the end. The staff members also keep in daily contact with the writers on "The Colbert Report” — also produced by Comedy Central — to see who is using what material, in what way, for that day’s shows.

10 to 11:30 a.m.: The writers write, using the themes and ideas discussed. It’s an intense but regimented routine. “We’re not at sea almost ever, as a writer on ‘The Daily Show,’” Mr. Ross said. “We know exactly what we need to get done at any period of time.”

He added: “We‘ve seen the video. We know there are four good sound bites for the story. It’s pretty laid out for you.”

Mr. Havlan said, “You get good at knowing what you need to attack.”

“They’re really fast and real good about it,” said Mr. Albanese, the producer, who said that comedy writing requires constant practice. “You get better at it. It’s a muscle and you work it out. It gets stronger.”

11:30 a.m.: The production staff members pop in and demand the material. The writers ask for five more minutes — which they are not given, but which they take, anyway.

11:37 a.m.: Hit print on the computer.

11:37 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.: The first-draft jokes from the writers go to Mr. Stewart, Mr. Bodow, Mr. Albanese, Mr. Javerbaum and Josh Lieb, an executive producer. They pick the jokes and shape the narrative arcs of the segments. The day’s script comes together through a couple of writing/editing sessions with various combinations of producers and writers, as needed. This happens in parallel with production and graphics staff members culling and editing together the video and images as needed.

3 p.m.: The script is ready. Production, art, control room and everybody else is putting the material together until rehearsal.

4:15 p.m.: Rehearsal begins with a final rewrite and a first run by Mr. Stewart at 4:45 p.m., lasting roughly an hour.

6 p.m.: Taping.

Of course, this doesn't cover filmed pieces, which come about over the course of several days.

And the article does answer a question I was wondering about — the writers do coordinate with "The Colbert Report" so that they don't have the same angle on the same material.

You Have To Be A Certain Age To Think This It’s Funny

Ken AshfordRandom MusingsLeave a Comment

But trust me, it's funny.  The Onion:

I Bet My 40s Are Totally Going To Rock

By Ed Heidegger
39-Year-Old

You know what I'm really excited about? Turning 40! The Big Four-Oh. I've got one hell of a landmark birthday coming up, and I'm pumped! I may have spent these past 39 years meandering through life, focused only on petty concerns, without any direction or drive, but not anymore. My unremarkable childhood, my awkward adolescence, my purposeless teens through early 30s—it's all been leading up to this. So look out world, because for the second half of my life, I'm going to rock out like a motherfucker!

Once I hit 40, man, there's going to be no stopping me. Soon as the big birthday rolls around, I'm planning on starting that novel, opening my long-dreamed-of record store, and finally breaking into the experimental underground film scene. By the time I'm 43, I wouldn't be surprised if I'm the hippest person I know. Hey—I've got a steady paycheck coming in, so there's no reason to put off being kick-ass any longer.

No chance I'm spending the last 50 percent of my life as a lame-o.

It's natural, at my age, to doubt yourself. But that's no kind of an attitude to have, dude! Sure, I've tried to rock for 39 years and I've failed. But I can't let myself quit now! This is my chance to finally achieve all the dreams I've spent more than three dozen years accruing.

This could be the decade!

As long as I stay focused on my original goal, established at age 12, of having a rocking life, the sky's the limit. Sure, I haven't managed to achieve anything so far. Fair enough. But the way I figure it, I can either let myself get depressed about that fact like I did when I turned 18, 21, 25, 30, 35, and 39, or I can choose to look at this as an opportunity. An opportunity to rock!

After all, who says just because the first four decades of a person's life were totally square that the rest of his life has to be boring, too?

Man, after 40 years of saving it up, can you imagine how hard I'm going to rock? I've already started growing some totally bitching, long flowing hair, just like I always wanted….

Read the whole thing.

Time Travel

Ken AshfordEnergy and ConservationLeave a Comment

I saw a station selling gas at $2.05 a gallon this morning, and for a split second, it was as if I had travelled back in time.  I wonder how long it was when gas around here was at $2.00 or under.

Turns out, not that long ago…

Gasprices  

In Christmas 2005, gas prices were around the $2.00 mark.

Let’s *Really* Protect Marriage, Shall We?

Ken AshfordSex/Morality/Family ValuesLeave a Comment

How about a constitutional amendment that prevents Christians from divorcing? 

The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?

And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,

And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?

Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. (Matthew 19:3-6)

Just thinking outside the box….

An Intellectual In The White House

Ken AshfordObama & AdministrationLeave a Comment

Kristof's column in the New York Times, entitled "Obama and the War on Brains" is a must-read.  It's about the return — the unapologetic return — of intellectual thinkers in the White House.  An excerpt:

Barack Obama’s election is a milestone in more than his pigmentation. The second most remarkable thing about his election is that American voters have just picked a president who is an open, out-of-the-closet, practicing intellectual.

***

Perhaps John Kennedy was the last president who was unapologetic about his intellect and about luring the best minds to his cabinet. More recently, we’ve had some smart and well-educated presidents who scrambled to hide it. Richard Nixon was a self-loathing intellectual, and Bill Clinton camouflaged a fulgent brain behind folksy Arkansas aphorisms about hogs.

As for President Bush, he adopted anti-intellectualism as administration policy, repeatedly rejecting expertise (from Middle East experts, climate scientists and reproductive health specialists). Mr. Bush is smart in the sense of remembering facts and faces, yet I can’t think of anybody I’ve ever interviewed who appeared so uninterested in ideas.

***

An intellectual is a person interested in ideas and comfortable with complexity. Intellectuals read the classics, even when no one is looking, because they appreciate the lessons of Sophocles and Shakespeare that the world abounds in uncertainties and contradictions, and — President Bush, lend me your ears — that leaders self-destruct when they become too rigid and too intoxicated with the fumes of moral clarity.

(Intellectuals are for real. In contrast, a pedant is a supercilious show-off who drops references to Sophocles and masks his shallowness by using words like “fulgent” and “supercilious.”)

Mr. Obama, unlike most politicians near a microphone, exults in complexity. He doesn’t condescend or oversimplify nearly as much as politicians often do, and he speaks in paragraphs rather than sound bites. Global Language Monitor, which follows linguistic issues, reports that in the final debate, Mr. Obama spoke at a ninth-grade reading level, while John McCain spoke at a seventh-grade level.

Kristof notes that being an intellectual doesn't necessary result in political sense.

No matter.

I, for one, welcome out new intellectual overlords.