Full Monty: The Cast

Ken AshfordPersonal1 Comment

Just announced:

JERRY LUKOWSKI:  Neil Shepherd

NATHAN LUKOWSKI:  1) W.J. Jessup for first and third weekend performances and 2) Jake Markley for second and fourth weekend performances

PAM LUKOWSKI/BALLROOM DANCER/MOURNER:  Tamara Fisher

TEDDY SLAUGHTER/BALLROOM DANCER/OTHER MAN/MOURNER:  Edwin Wilson

DAVE BUKATINSKY:  Eric Dowdy

GEORGIE BUKATINSKY:  Emily Mark

HAROLD NICHOLS:  Scott Stevens

VICKI NICHOLS:  Heather Maggs

MALCOLM MACGREGOR:  Gray Smith

ETHAN GIRARD:  Scott Terrill

NOAH "HORSE" T. SIMMONS:  Elliott Lowery

JEANETTE BURMEISTER:  Sally Hord

SUSAN HERSHEY/MOLLY MACGREGOR/BALLROOM DANCER/MOURNER:  Yunique Johnson

JOANIE LISH/JOGGER WITH "STUART"/YOUNG WOMAN AT DANCE CLASS (BALLROOM DANCER)/MOURNER:  Emily Austin Snow

ESTELLE GENOVESE/BETTY/BALLROOM DANCER/MOURNER/STROLLER-ROLLER THROUGH PARK:  Angela Chandler

REG WILLOUGHBY/HALF OF THE GAY DANCE COUPLE (BALLROOM DANCER)/ MOURNER / EXTRA JOGGER, WITH "MARTY":  Tavis Baker

GARY/SECOND STRIPPER/REPO MAN #1/BALLROOM DANCER/MOURNER/DUTY SARGE: Alex Campbell

MARTY/HALF OF THE GAY DANCE COUPLE (BALLROOM DANCER)/JOGGER WITH "REG"/MOURNER/A MAN/THIRD STRIPPER:  James Slade

DOLORES/WOMAN (ON STREET)/BALLROOM DANCER/MOURNER:  Cristina Madrigal

STUART/BALLROOM DANCER/MOURNER/REPO MAN # 2/EXTRA JOGGER, WITH "JOANIE": Lee Huggins

FREDA/BALLROOM DANCER/MOURNER/BAG LADY IN THE PARK:  Melinda Anderson

SAL/MINISTER/TONY/BALLROOM DANCE INSTRUCTOR (DANCES WITH "JOANIE")/POLICE SARGEANT/REPO MAN # 3 :  Ken Ashford

To be honest, if I were directing, and based on the auditions I saw, this is exactly how I would have cast it.  I won’t hide my disappointment at not getting "Dave" — especially if it would have meant playing opposite to Emily — but Eric Dowdy was good.  And I’m always excited to work with people like Heather, Emily, Neil, and Gray, from whom I can learn.  This Scott Stevens guy looks like a player, too.

UPDATE:  Hey, I think I’m the nightclub owner!!!

I think it’s going to be a good show, and I’m very happy (especially for Neil and Gray).

NC Witnesses Can Swear on Quran In Court

Ken AshfordConstitution, Courts/Law, Godstuff, Local InterestLeave a Comment

Ks11845I’ve been following this story for a while, and frankly, I’m not sure why it was an issue to begin with:

The issue surfaced when Muslims tried to donate copies of the Quran to Guilford County’s two courthouses. Two judges declined to accept the texts, saying that taking an oath on the Quran was illegal under state law.

What exactly is the North Carolina state law regarding this?

Judges and other persons who may be empowered to administer oaths, shall (except in the cases in this Chapter excepted) require the party to be sworn to lay his hand upon the Holy Scriptures, in token of his engagement to speak the truth and in further token that, if he should swerve from the truth, he may be justly deprived of all the blessings of that holy book and made liable to that vengeance which he has imprecated on his own head.

There is also a provision that a witness can make an affirmation without resort to the Scriptures or God.  (This is for the benefit of both atheists, as well as people whose religious forbids them to "swear" to God).

The ACLU intervened and a lawsuit was filed.  Today, we got a result:

Any religious text, and not just the Bible, can be used to swear in a witness or juror in North Carolina’s courtrooms, a Wake County judge ruled Thursday.

"As of today, all people can use the holy text of their choice," said Seth Cohen, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union who argued the case. "We think it’s a great victory."

The ruling from Superior Court Judge Paul Ridgeway came after the ACLU argued that limiting the text to the Bible was unconstitutional because it favored Christianity over other religions. Citing common law and precedent of the state Supreme Court, he said those taking a court oath can use a text "most sacred and obligatory upon their conscience."

This, of course, is the right decision by the Court. 

Remember, the point of taking an oath is so that the jurors can be assured that the witness is telling the truth.  Imagine yourself as a juror, and the witness (to say, a car accident) is asked to testify about what he saw.  But before he testifies, he’s asked to swear to tell the truth on the Bible, a book he doesn’t believe in!  How much is "swearing on the Bible" going to have to a person who practices the religion of Islam?  Not much.  But if he ask him to "swear to tell the truth" on a religious text that is sacred to the witness, you are more likely to get honest testimony.

The state of North Carolina lost this case (thankfully).  They have 30 days to review, and decide if they want to appeal.  Let’s hope they don’t.

Bird Poops On President

Ken AshfordBush & Co.Leave a Comment

…just as he’s saying (again) how much he supports Alberto Gonzales.

If that’s not a metaphor for something, I don’t know what is.

Wonkette snarks:

Reached in outer space Thursday afternoon, God said he made a little bird shit on Dubya “to show My disgust with this administration.”

After being shit upon, “Bush tried several times to wipe [it] off. ” But he failed.

UPDATE: Keith Olbermann: “Must’ve been a dove.”

Cute Overload

Ken AshfordRandom MusingsLeave a Comment

Not a lot of time or inclination to do another installment of "1980’s Videos Explained", so instead, I’ll simply show a video of a cat with baby bunnies….

Frankly, I think it is a disaster waiting to happen….

Full Monty: The Callbacks [UPDATED]

Ken AshfordPersonal1 Comment

Fullmonty_000 Well, let me make a correction to yesterday’s post.  I said (several times) that there were five guys who made up the set of unemployed steelworkers who decide to strip.  I was wrong.  It’s six.

That said, I went to callbacks this evening with a lot of trepidation.  Since it was the last day of regular auditions, callbacks didn’t start until 8:15ish.

I noticed tonight that many women showed up, and only a couple of guys.  That’s good.  The women included Emily (yay!), Heather, and an ex-girlfriend who — well, never mind.  I also learned that a couple of women did in fact audition earlier this week in Winston-Salem.  But only a couple.

Heather greeted me with a "you bastard" or something like that, because this morning I had persuaded her to audition.  She didn’t know the show OR the music, but you wouldn’t know from the way she auditioned.  I’m glad she did.  I never got a chance to talk to her about her honeymoon though.

Only 4 women were called back.  Of course, they will cast more than just four.  Emily and Heather were, naturally, two of them.  They sang, they read a few scenes.  I got to read for the "Dave" role opposite Heather, which was cool.  She nailed it.

As for the guys, there were about 8 of us.  And they were clearly looking for guys to fill the spots of four of the six strippers — Jerry (lead), Dave (his "fat bastard" buddy), Harold (the suprevisor), and Malcolm (the nebbishy guy).  There were, for example, no black guys there for the role of "Horse".

And for the part of Dave, they were clearly only looking at me and this other guy named Eric.

A caveat that I would do well to keep in mind: the absence of someone at callbacks doesn’t mean they aren’t being considered.  It could mean they just had a conflict.  For example, Jeff Agular wasn’t there, but I don’t think it was for any other reason other than a conflict.  But Neil was there, Gray was there, that guy Scott was there (from last night), and a few faces I didn’t know.

So just because it looked like they were only reading me and another guy for Dave, doesn’t mean it’s just down to us two.  For all I know, they may have found the perfect Dave three days ago.

It’s impossible to tea-leaf-read these things.  Neil and Gray were phenomenal.  Heather and Emily were phenomenal.  I’m not even in the same league, and I know it.  As for the guy who I was "competing" with for Dave, he was good — a bit younger than me.  I generally liked my readings better, but his interpretation was influenced by Jamie’s direction (which he followed well).  Sadly, during one of my readings, I got a little tongue-tied, but I don’t think it was fatal.

They started us off with singing.  For each male role they were looking at, the musical director selected the songs with the highest notes.  There was a lot of screeching for the men (this is a VERY hard show musically).  Even Neil and Gray were struggling, but they’re such consummate singers, they pulled it off.  Me?  Well, not so much.  I did the best I could.  There were just a couple notes I couldn’t hit — I switched to my falsetto and got close.  And I was a bit self-conscious that I went flat on notes that I should have hit.  Ugh.  I don’t want to think about that.

No dance movement though.

Jamie’s got a tough task.  I know he probably has formulated his "cast" in his head, but of course, he has to contend with the viewpoints of Dauna (the choreographer) and April (the musical director), as well as — to a perhaps lesser extent — the input of the artistic directors of both CTG and Little Theatre of Winston-Salem (both of whom were there for callbacks).  You get five creative people in one room trying to cast a show, and it’s — well — it has the potential for ugliness.  Or maybe not.  You never know with these things.

In any event, we were told we would get a call by 1:00 tomorrow.  I don’t know if that means we’ll get a call if we didn’t get cast, or if we’ll only get called if we did.  And the first rehearsal is tomorrow evening.  Yup, it’s a tight schedule — opening night is July 6, which is in six weeks, an incredibly short time for an ambitious musical like this.

But right now, I’m going to bed.  I can’t do anything more at this point.

UPDATE:  Well, it’s 11:50 a.m. the next day, and no word.  This probably means I didn’t get cast as Dave.  Oh, well.  Just hope I can get involved in some way.

UPDATE No. 2 (1:00 p.m.):  Got cast in chorus/various roles.  That other guy, Eric, got the "Dave" part.  Technically, I am "SAL/MINISTER/TONY/BALLROOM DANCE INSTRUCTOR (DANCES WITH
"JOANIE")/POLICE SARGEANT/REPO MAN # 3 ".

Full Monty: The Audition [UPDATED]

Ken AshfordPersonalLeave a Comment

Check for updates below…

Well, for those who have been following my sorry excuse for a life, tonight was my audition night for the Little Theatre of Winston-Salem/Community Theatre of Greensboro production of the musical "The Full Monty", based on the movie of the same name. 

When I first saw this show in New York on Broadway (and I went reluctantly), I remember sitting there having such fun, and thinking, "If I ever get the chance to do this show, I should really make a stab at doing it."  Of course, I doubted such a chance would reveal itself, but it did.

For those who don’t know the show or movie, it’s about five six unemployed steel mill workers who decide to earn some extra money performing — well, dancing — okay, stripping, at a local club in Buffalo.  Will they or won’t they go all the way (i.e., "the full monty")?  How will it effect their relationships with their wives, girlfriends and children?  What happens to five six guys when they suddenly find themselves objectified as sex objects?  It’s a very very funny and warm show, culminating in this showstopping number (as performed by the original Broadway cast at the Tony Awards several years ago):

Now, there are four days of auditions — two in Winston-Salem (earlier this week, Monday and Tuesday) and two in Greensboro (this evening and tomorrow evening), with callbacks tomorrow evening as well.  The scuttlebutt for months was that a LOT of guys in the Triad area were auditioning, and I didn’t think I held out much of a chance.  Of the five six leads (the guys who actually go the full monty), I realistically thought — because of my age — that I had a shot at only one of the "five six guys" roles: the role of Harold (the former steel plant supervisor of the other guys).  He’s also the only baritone of the five six(except for the black guy, which I can’t do), and I’m a baritone.

So I shot for Harold (even though, to be honest, I was waffling back on forth for a few days about whether to try out at all).  I even got my hair cut conservatively (for me) yesterday. But I didn’t audition in Winston-Salem either Monday or Tuesday.  I just wasn’t well-rested or prepared.  I wasn’t very rested today either, but I left work a couple hours earlier, worked on my audition song ("A Marriage Proposal" from March of the Falsettos), and silently prayed — and sang – as I drove to Greensboro.

I arrived in Greensboro early for the audition with a knot in my stomach, assisted I suspect by a hot dog I grabbed on the way at one of those convenience/gas station places — you know the kind of hot dogs that have probably been sitting there all day?  (What was I thinking?!?  Stupid, Ken, stupid.) 

Something about musical auditions really freaks me out — probably because I am not a strong singer or dancer.

Let me cut to the chase: I quickly learned that only 14 people — fourteen! — had tried out Monday and yesterday in Winston-Salem.  I had expected 30 or so.  That uplifted my spirits a bit.  Unfortunately, all those people were guys, but still…. only 14 guys?  That’s not as stiff competition as I thought.

At tonight’s audition, there were about 14 people, about 10 of them were guys.  I knew most of them.  Neil Sheppard for one.  I knew he would try out, and I sort of figured him as Dave (the "fat one").  But then I saw how much weight he had lost, and realized that he could be either Jerry (the lead) or Malcolm (another of the guys).  I knew most of the other men who auditioned there, too: Lee Huggins, Jeff Aguilar, Steve Collier, to name a few.  I was also familiar with a few others from other local productions (CTG’s "Beauty and the Beast", "Just Kidding", etc.)

So how did I do?  First came the musical audition.  And to put it bluntly, I tanked.  I did my best, but I think nerves got in the way.  All my preparation just failed me.  I guess I was tired too — it’s been a rough few days.  I mean, I didn’t butcher it, but I know I could have done better. 

The reason I know I didn’t impress them is because they ran scales for the people who obviously could sing (you could hear them through the walls), and they didn’t run them for me and a couple others.  Besides, there was another guy there who sang and acted great, and he was a baritone.  He was perfect for Harold, and I knew it right away.

Dancing was next.  That was fine.  I had worked with Donna (the choreographer) before.  She’s a sassy, foul-mouthed black woman, and I just love her to death.  Of course, the joke of the show is that these guys can’t dance very sexy, but she wanted to see what we could do anyhow.  I think I did fine, at least compared to most of the guys (except, of course, for real dancers like Jeff).

Then came the reading.  Now, I’ve worked with Jamie (the director) many times before, and he — like most directors — has an idea of what part he would like you to audition for, even if it’s not what you had in mind.  And it’s clear that he was looking to me as a possible Dave, the "fat guy" and the best friend of Jerry (the lead role).  It’s like a few years ago, when I auditioned for Jamie for "Gilligan’s Island: The Musical" — I auditioned for The Professor; Jamie cast me as The Skipper.

Anyway, I read a few times for Harold, but by then, it was clear to me that this other guy was far far better on every metric (looks, singing, etc.) for the Harold part.  So I gave all I had for the Dave readings.  It was hard switching gears, because I had been thinking Harold for months — Harold is upper-class and rich; Dave is an average Joe Sixpack.  Actually, Dave is a larger/better role than Harold’s, but I dismissed him early because the songs he sings are SO HIGH that I just figured I wouldn’t stand a chance.

And Neil Sheppard — what can I say?  I read with him.  Man, he is such a giving actor.  I mean, he is so great.  He gave me looks to play off of — it was phenomenal.  What a pleasure just to read with him. 

My "fantasy" — now that the whole thing is over — is that I would play Dave opposite Neil playing Jerry (and he was outstanding as Jerry).  Of course, not knowing what transpired the other two audition nights and who showed up, I have no idea what my chances are.  I’m sure the musical director would NOT want me as one of the five six guys.  Realistically, the only way I could get Dave is if nobody decent tries out with my, um, girth (I have mixed feelings about this, seeing as how I’m 30 pounds lighter than a couple of years ago, but….).  And listening to the soundtrack on the way home after auditioning, I think I can pull Dave off.

So, callbacks are tomorrow.  I haven’t the slightest idea if I will be called back.  None at all.  Of course, if I don’t, that doesn’t mean I won’t be cast — it’ll probably just mean I’m not one of the five six guys.  I think I’ll be disappointed if that happens, but I’ll survive and be over it in a day.  I went into this thinking it was a longshot.

But I’ll be devastated if I don’t get cast at all, as anything.

Anyway, I’m surprised turnout was so low for men, and even more surprised that it was so low for women.  There are a lot of good women parts in this show.  And only four showed up in three days?  I know Emily is auditioning tomorrow — maybe others will as well.

Well, time will tell.  To be continued….

(Or perhaps not)

UPDATE (12:05 p.m., Thursday):  Spent all morning in the dentist’s chair, hoping I would get some news by the time I got out.  It’s now noon on Thursday — so far, nothing.  No message at home, or cell, or work.  No email.  Doesn’t look good.  Had a nice email exchange with Heather who is still on the fence about auditioning.  Hope she makes the right choice.

UPDATE NO. 2 (1:35 p.m., Thursday):  Got the callback for tonight.  Wish I had more than three hours sleep last night.

Goodling Answers Questions

Ken AshfordAttorney FiringsLeave a Comment

GoodlingMonica Goodling, a 33-year-old graduate of Pat Robertson’s Regent University with six months of prosecutorial experience — the woman who helped purge prosecutors who failed to be partisan enough — the woman who refused to hire attorneys because they were "too liberal" (a violation of federal law) — is testifying today.

She’s weaseled her way to receiving immunity, so one wonders whether or not, and to what extent, she’ll implicate the White House (Karl Rove, Harriet Miers, etc).  I don’t hold out much hope.  [UPDATE: Kevin Drum notes that she is expected to be "forthcoming" today]

Firedoglake, once again, outdoes the mainstream media with its liveblogging coverage.

UPDATE:  Well, so far she’s merely suggesting White House involvement, but it’s early in the day.

One observer’s   so far: "There seem to be two narratives going on in Goodling’s testimony. The first is that she was a nobody with little power who may have inadvertently overstepped her authority occasionally. The second narrative line intrudes into the other from time to time. In this one (call it the Type A narrative), Goodling has the power to make and break people, a power that she repeatedly exercises."

On Jihadists

Ken AshfordGodstuff, War on Terrorism/TortureLeave a Comment

Like Glenn Greenwald, I am getting increasingly tired of the Malkin-types who make it their daily mission to try to scare everybody into thinking that Muslims — even American Muslins — are all hell-bent on committing acts of terrorists

If an imam prays to Mecca before boarding a plane in some remote airport, the right wing punditry — Rush, Malkin, the Fox kids — run with it for days, hyping outrageous fear and loathing …despite the fact that the imam was merely practicing his religion.

If olive-skinned Americans are buying a lot of cellphones all of a sudden, its time to alert the authorities (never mind that it is the holiday season, and everybody is buying cellphones as gifts).

For the fearmongers, the drumbeat goes on and on and on…

What then, I wonder, would they make of this?

Even in death, the Rev. Jerry Falwell rouses the most volatile of emotions.

A small group of protesters gathered near the funeral services to criticize the man who mobilized Christian evangelicals and made them a major force in American politics — often by playing on social prejudices.

A group of students from Falwell’s Liberty University staged a counterprotest.

And Campbell County authorities arrested a Liberty University student for having several homemade bombs in his car.

The student, 19-year-old Mark D. Uhl of Amissville, Va., reportedly told authorities that he was making the bombs to stop protesters from disrupting the funeral service. The devices were made of a combination of gasoline and detergent, a law enforcement official told ABC News’ Pierre Thomas. They were "slow burn," according to the official, and would not have been very destructive.

"There were indications that there were others involved in the manufacturing of these devices and we are still investigating these individuals with the assistance of ATF [Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms], Virginia State Police and FBI. At this time it is not believed that these devices were going to be used to interrupt the funeral services at Liberty University," the Campbell County Sheriff’s Office said in a release.

Three other suspects are being sought, one of whom is a soldier from Fort Benning, Ga., and another is a high school student. No information was available on the third suspect.

This is the MySpace page for the alleged Liberty University bomber, Mark David Uhl. He lists his religion as "Christian," claims to be Caucasian and straight, says that among the types of music he enjoys is "worship" music, and vows that he "will join the ARMY as an officer after college" (emphasis in original). He also indicates that he is now in the Army ROTC, and advises that his name, "Mark," means "Mighty Warrior."

His favorite book is the Bible. He claims to be a "Solider of Christ." The first MySpace friend he lists is "Jesus".

His is not an isolated case:

A couple of weeks ago, Dave Neiwert examined an arrest in Austin, Texas of a pro-life activist planning an Eric-Rudolph-like bombing of an abortion clinic, along with the arrests of members of the "Alabama Free Militia" who were stockpiling grenades (h/t Hume’s Ghost). Just today, USA Today reported on the problems law enforcement is facing from vigilantes and other lawbreakers who resort to violence to advance their anti-immigration agenda, and a Free Republic employee and anti-immigration activist was recently arrested for bringing large numbers of weapons to an anti-immigration protest and having Molotov cocktails in his home (h/t reader BR).

My point is not to say that anyone who is Christian is a potential bomber.  That, of course, is not only silly, but insulting.  My point is to suggest that if the religion had been changed — if the Liberty University bomber had been Islamic and a follower of the Koran — Malkin and her ilk would condemn not only the man, but ALL believers of Islam ("See?  Islam is a religion of peace?  Well, what about this guy?!?")

The vast majority of American Christians, anti-abortionists, anti-immigration people — like the vast majority of American Muslims — are peaceful and sincere and condemn all forms of terrorism.  It is wrong to paint an entire swath of people — of any faith — based on the criminal and evil activities of a few outliers.

Extremism is the enemy here.  Islamic extremism, Christian extremism — it’s all bad.  But that should never be used to condemn Islamism or Christianity or anything else as a whole.