The Republican War On Science: White House Tries To Muzzle Global Warming Research

Ken AshfordEnvironment & Global Warming & EnergyLeave a Comment

ABC:

Bush administration officials throughout the government have engaged in White House-directed efforts to stifle, delay or dampen the release of climate change research that casts the White House or its policies in a bad light, says a new report that purports to be the most comprehensive assessment to date of the subject.

Researchers for the non-profit watchdog Government Accountability Project reviewed thousands of e-mails, memos and other documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests and from government whistle-blowers and conducted dozens of interviews with public affairs staff, scientists, reporters and others.

The group says it has identified hundreds of instances where White House-appointed officials interfered with government scientists’ efforts to convey their research findings to the public, at the behest of top administration officials.

The report is slated to be released tomorrow at a hearing before the House Science Committee, which is investigating the issue.

It’s Not A Scandal Unless There’s A ‘Monica’ Involved

Ken AshfordAttorney Firings, ConstitutionLeave a Comment

And now we have one.

Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales’s senior counselor, Monica Goodling, yesterday refused to testify in the Senate about her involvement in the firings of eight U.S. attorneys, invoking her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

The letter sent by Monica’s attorneys explains the reasons why.  But here’s the thing: none of the reasons pertain to self-incrimination

You can’t invoke the privilege because you think the investigation is being conducted in a "partisan" fashion (yet this is one of the "reasons" given). 

You can’t invoke the privilege because it may lead to criminal charges against someone else (yet this is one of the "reasons" given). 

The real reason that Monica’s lawyer want her to avoid testifying is spelled out thusly:

"The potential for legal jeopardy for Ms. Goodling from even her most truthful and accurate testimony under these circumstances is very real. One need look no further than the recent circumstances and proceedings involving Lewis Libby."

The only problem with that sentence is that Lewis Libby was convicted of NOT giving truthful and accurate testimony.  And he was found guilty — not by a panel of partisan Democrat congressmen — but by a jury of ordinary American citizens. 

Now, it may be true that a witness innocent of wrongdoing may well refuse to answer a question not because he fears conviction, but because he fears unfounded prosecution.  (UPDATE: Orin Kerr disagrees).  However, since the risk of "unfounded prosecution" one runs at all times (theoretically at least) the 5th Amendment invocation must be asserted in good faith.  I suggest that this is not made in good faith, since the attorneys invoke Scooter Libby — a man who was NOT unfoundly unprosecuted according to a jury of his peers.

I suspect what is really going on is that she is afraid to testify, in part because there’s hardly a consensus in the White House and DOJ as to what the cover story is for the attorney firings.  Nice of her to want to be a part of the loyal team, but she’s toast now anyway.  She might as well save her soul and talk.  It’s her only key to salvation.

RELATED:  It’s worth noting that the deputy AG testified truthfully last month, and that’s how this scandal started.  Of course, he testified about the TRUTH, something which the White House urged him not to do.  For the people in the White House, telling the truth is secondary to preserving their power.

Remains Of 9-11 Victims Used To Fill Potholes

Ken AshfordWar on Terrorism/TortureLeave a Comment

I’m speechless:

The pulverized remains of bodies from the World Trade Center disaster site were used by city workers to fill ruts and potholes, a city contractor says in a sworn affidavit filed Friday in Manhattan Federal Court.

Eric Beck says debris powders – known as fines – were put in a pothole-fill mixture by crews at the Fresh Kills landfill on Staten Island, N.Y., where more than 1.65 million tons of World Trade Center debris were deposited after the Sept. 11 attacks.

"I observed the New York City Department of Sanitation taking these fines from the conveyor belts of our machines, loading it onto tractors and using it to pave roads and fill in potholes, dips and ruts," Eric Beck said.

Beck was the senior supervisor for Taylor Recycling, a private contractor hired to sift through debris trucked to Fresh Kills after the trade center attacks. Before the arrival of Taylor’s equipment at Fresh Kills in October 2001, the debris was sifted manually by workers using rakes and shovels.

Beck’s affidavit was filed by lawyers for the families of Sept. 11 victims who are suing the city in hopes of creating a formal burial place for debris that they say contains human remains.

"It’s devastating," Norman Siegel, an attorney representing the families, said of Beck’s statement. "When the 9/11 families found about this, they were wiped out."

Dinner In The Sky

Ken AshfordRandom MusingsLeave a Comment

Dinner_hmp

When I went to Belgium, I thought it was nice.  But something was missing.

Yup.  Nowhere in that entire country was there a place for 22 people to enjoy dinner while sitting at a table suspended high over the world below.

Thank God they’ve fixed that.

Multi-tasking: Not All That Great

Ken AshfordScience & TechnologyLeave a Comment

For those of you who think you’re all that because you can do three things at once, the latest studies are here to tell you that you’re not doing anything better:

Think you can juggle phone calls, e-mail, instant messages and computer work to get more done in a time-starved world? Read on, preferably shutting out the cacophony of digital devices for a while.

Several research reports, both recently published and not yet published, provide evidence of the limits of multitasking. The findings, according to neuroscientists, psychologists and management professors, suggest that many people would be wise to curb their multitasking behavior when working in an office, studying or driving a car.

These experts have some basic advice. Check e-mail messages once an hour, at most. Listening to soothing background music while studying may improve concentration. But other distractions — most songs with lyrics, instant messaging, television shows — hamper performance. Driving while talking on a cellphone, even with a hands-free headset, is a bad idea.

In short, the answer appears to lie in managing the technology, instead of merely yielding to its incessant tug.

Multitasking is going to slow you down, increasing the chances of mistakes,” said David E. Meyer, a cognitive scientist and director of the Brain, Cognition and Action Laboratory at the University of Michigan. “Disruptions and interruptions are a bad deal from the standpoint of our ability to process information.”

The human brain, with its hundred billion neurons and hundreds of trillions of synaptic connections, is a cognitive powerhouse in many ways. “But a core limitation is an inability to concentrate on two things at once,” said René Marois, a neuroscientist and director of the Human Information Processing Laboratory at Vanderbilt University.

Human-Animal Hybrids

Ken AshfordScience & TechnologyLeave a Comment

Bush State of The Union, 2006:

Tonight I ask you to pass legislation to prohibit the most egregious abuses of medical research: human cloning in all its forms; creating or implanting embryos for experiments; creating human-animal hybrids; and buying, selling or patenting human embryos.

Like many, when I heard Bush talk about human-animal hybrids, I was preplexed.  Great, I thought.  Now he believes in werewolves.

But apparently, it’s not science fiction.  Scientists have created a sheep which is 15% human:

The sheep have 15 per cent human cells and 85 per cent animal cells – and their evolution brings the prospect of animal organs being transplanted into humans one step closer.

Professor Esmail Zanjani, of the University of Nevada, has spent seven years and £5m  ($A12m) perfecting the technique, which involves injecting adult human cells into a sheep’s foetus.

He has already created a sheep liver which has a large proportion of human cells and eventually hopes to precisely match a sheep to a transplant patient, using their own stem cells to create their own flock of sheep.

The process would involve extracting stem cells from the donor’s bone marrow and injecting them into the peritoneum of a sheep’s foetus.

When the lamb is born, two months later, it would have a liver, heart, lungs and brain that are partly human and available for transplant.

Ethically, I don’t have a problem with this, although I suppose developments of this sort will bring together an odd alliance between PETA and the religious right.  Still, it’s interesting.  Brave new world and all that.

Tale As Old As Time…

Ken AshfordLocal Interest2 Comments

A big shout-out to Gray (the Beast) and Emily (Belle) who play the title roles in the production of Beauty and the Beast, opening tonight at the Little Theatre of Winston-Salem.  I send my fondest "break-a-leg" wishes to them, as well as Craig (Gaston) and the Barnhardt sisters.

Emily reports that opening night is all but sold out, and tickets for the rest of the run are going fast.  Not surprising.  I hear good things, I hear good things….

Pictured below:  Because I don’t have a picture of Emily and Gray in this particular show, you’ll have to settle for a picture of Emily and Gray in "Bat Boy" — another musical where Emily falls for a beast played by Gray…

Emily_044

RELATED:  Attention casting directors!  I’ve got yer gal for the "Valerie Plame" movie.

Valerie Plame:

Valerie_plame

Heather Hamby:

Redhs

So please contact me, Valerie Plame biopic casting directors, via this website. I’m only demanding a paltry 6%.  I’ll work out an arrangement with Heather…

Who’s Left In The GOP?

Ken AshfordRepublicansLeave a Comment

PartyidNot many:

Public allegiance to the Republican Party has plunged during George W. Bush’s presidency, as attitudes have edged away from some of the conservative values that fueled GOP political victories, a major survey has found.

The survey, by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, found a "dramatic shift" in political party identification since 2002, when Republicans and Democrats were at rough parity. Now, 50% of those surveyed identified with or leaned toward Democrats, whereas 35% aligned with Republicans.

What’s more, the survey found, public attitudes are drifting toward Democrats’ values: Support for government aid to the disadvantaged has grown since the mid-1990s, skepticism about the use of military force has increased and support for traditional family values has decreased.

The findings suggest that the challenges for the GOP reach beyond the unpopularity of the war in Iraq and Bush.

***

"There are cycles in history where one party or one movement ascends for a while and then it sows the seeds of its own self-destruction," said Bruce Bartlett, a conservative analyst and author of the 2006 book "Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy."

Bartlett added, "It’s clear we have come to an end of a Republican conservative era."

It should be noted that this is more than just a shift in party affiliation.  The Pew Survey shows a shift in voter values.  The Republican’s hot button social issues ("old fashioned-values about family and marriage") are not as hot as they used to be and a majority simply disagree with Republicans on safety nets for those in need.

The Sympathy Surge

Ken AshfordElection 2008, Right Wing Punditry/Idiocy1 Comment

Leave to the vile right-wing radio morons to suggest that John Edwards is using his wife’s battle with cancer for political ends and to garnish votes.

Rush Limbaugh, who suggested a few months ago that Michael J. Fox was exaggerated his disease for political effect, said yesterday about the Edwards press conference:

Now, this suggests to me that, look, let’s just see how much sympathy or attention the press conference and the news today evokes and what it does to the campaign, if this jump-starts the Edwards campaign. …Edwards is going to get much, much more than that out of this.

That fat blowhard needs to be sodomized with his EIB microphone.

NOTE:  Fortunately, not all conservative pundits are reacting this way.  Even the folks at The Corner, for instance, can set aside their bias and make the following comment about the Edwards press conference::

The most endearing moment of this Edwards press conference: As Elizabeth Edwards was describing how she managed to break a rib — the cause of the pain that lead her to get medical treatment which ultimately revealed the cancer — Mrs. Edwards recounted her husband hugging her, the point at which she noticed something wrong with her..

After she went through the details, John Edwards jumped in and said, "actually, I was beating her," as he made a ridiculous arm and hand motion, looking clearly like a guy who wouldn’t even know how to hit his wife. It was a playful, endearing moment, the kind that one imagines helps a couple that has some real love between them get through yet another painful family time. The Edwards family has had more than their share of those hard times.

Snowjob

Ken AshfordAttorney FiringsLeave a Comment

White House Press Secretary Tony Snow, 10/6/06:

Members of Congress have their own oversight obligations. They may proceed as they wish. They’re a separate and co-equal branch of government and I’m not going to tell them what they can and can’t do.

White House Press Secretary Tony Snow, yesterday:

There’s another principle, which is Congress doesn’t have the legislative — I mean oversight authority over the White House. [CNN, 3/22/07]

First, the White House is under no compulsion to do anything. The legislative branch doesn’t have oversight. [MSNBC, 3/22/07]

Congress doesn’t have any legitimate oversight and responsibilities to the White House. [Fox, 3/22/07]

“Feminism Destroying America”

Ken AshfordGodstuff, Right Wing Punditry/Idiocy, Women's Issues1 Comment

Chuck2So says Chuck Baldwin, Founder-Pastor of Crossroads Baptist Church in Pensacola, Florida and vice presidential nominee for the Constitution Party in 2004:

When one searches to find the causes for America’s rapid deterioration, there is no shortage of suspects. However, my thirty-plus years experience as a pastor, counselor, and researcher has convinced me that there is no greater threat to America’s future survival than the overall negative effect that modern-day feminism has had, and is having, upon our homes and churches.

Terrorism comes in a distant second, apparently.

In just over three decades, the feminist movement has completely uprooted and rewritten the norm for American family life. No longer are women seen as nurturers and helpmeets. The push for "equality" has done much more than move America’s women from the kitchen to the boardroom; it has moved them from under the arm and next to the side of their husbands to, in many cases, a place of independence from, and lordship over, them.

It’s like when we gave them coloreds the right to vote.  All of a sudden, they actually thought they were entitled to be something!

Wives and mothers today seem to take pride in their ability to "control" their husbands. At the same time, however, they seem to be oblivious to the fact that they have absolutely no control over their children. But neither will they allow their husbands (or anyone else) to discipline their children. As a result, today’s kids are growing up mostly undisciplined, unrestrained, and uncontrollable.

Sounds like Pastor Baldwin hates being pussy-whipped.  Trouble at home, Chuck?

Ask any teacher, Sunday School teacher, coach, or youth worker, and they will tell you the same thing: today’s children are out of control!

Exclamation point!

Many people have far more control over their pets than they do their own children.

If only our children would respond to rolled-up newspapers and shock collars….

Sadder still is the fact that the only answer anyone seems inclined to proffer is to put these kids on behavior modification drugs, which, as almost anyone knows, only exacerbates the problem.

I guess he’s a medical expert now.

The problem with most children is not an inability to sit still and learn; it is the inability of parents to make their children sit still and learn. When it comes to making children mind, many parents today seem to be absolutely and totally helpless. I have never seen anything like it.

And he’s spied through the windows of many his neighbors, so he oughta know.

Please don’t misunderstand me. I am not one who believes that all of our marital and family problems are due to women working outside the home. However, I do believe that any couple that places their personal careers or ambitions above their primary responsibility to raise respectable, honest, obedient children is not only failing their children; they are failing our country.

I see.  So it’s the "couple" who abandon their "primary responsbility", but only the woman who gets the blame.

Selfish, materialistic, egocentric children do not make good citizens. They don’t make good employees, good policemen, good teachers, good judges, good pastors, good congressmen, good physicians, or good role models. In fact, they don’t make good anythings.

At this point, I would be tempted to ask the pastor if children should have been aborted.

Ever since our politically correct society decided that America’s fathers and husbands were no longer qualified to be the heads of their families, our society has fallen into chaos. America’s dads are reduced to being the butt end of every comedian’s joke, the fall guy in every sitcom, and the stupid buffoon in every television commercial.

Being a punchline for a comedian’s joke = society in chaos.  Got that everyone?

However, it does not matter what Gloria Steinem and her feminist friends think about it, there is an established natural order for healthy, productive family life.

And there was once an established order where white people owned black people.  Just because something is "established" doesn’t make it right or moral.

Man has a natural headship responsibility to both his family and his community. When men surrender this responsibility, or when women wrestle it away from them, the entire family and social structures collapse. And that is exactly what is currently happening.

Poor emasculated Chuck Baldwin.  Is he upset at kids being our of control, or women being out of control?

In Which I Demonstrate How I Channel The New York Times Theatre Critics

Ken AshfordPopular CultureLeave a Comment

My review of "Curtains", March 5, 2007:

Much about "Curtains" is familiar and predictable, even stereotypical. 

New York Times review of "Curtains", March 23, 2007:

There’s something soothing, even soporific, about such unaggressive predictability. But I’m assuming — and maybe I’m wrong — that you don’t go to Broadway for lullabies.

My review of "Curtains", March 5, 2007:

But this book was nothing but theatrical cliches and lame jokes (Here’s an example: "Gee, I wanted this show to make a killing, but not like this.")

New York Times review of "Curtains", March 23, 2007:

The script fires out a tireless fusillade of jokes, in the apparent hope that a few of them are bound to hit their targets.

My review of "Curtains", March 5, 2007:

The score by Kander & Ebb was not much better.  There was nothing memorable or catchy.

New York Times review of "Curtains", March 23, 2007:

But here his melodies, especially in the would-be showstoppers, are often repetitious without being rousing.

My review of "Curtains", March 5, 2007:

David Hyde Pierce, who more-or-less carries the show….

New York Times review of "Curtains", March 23, 2007:

David Hyde Pierce,who (this is the good news) steps into full-fledged Broadway stardom with his performance here…

My review of "Curtains", March 5, 2007:

There were nice moments when they rose above the material — for example, a "dream" sequence where Pierce and his co-star imagine they are in a Marge & Gower Champion musical number, complete with smoke and white staircases.

New York Times review of "Curtains", March 23, 2007:

In the second act Mr. Hyde Pierce and Ms. Paice are allowed, for one song, to turn into Fred and Ginger in an RKO dream world. Choreographed as a dexterous blend of sendup and valentine by Mr. Ashford*, the number expresses the sheer, lightheaded love of that silly and sublime form, the musical, that is what “Curtains” is meant to be about. The song is called “A Tough Act to Follow,” and nothing that precedes or follows it is on its level.

My review of "Curtains", March 5, 2007:

I think one line from "Curtains" — a laugh line, presumably — sums it best: "This show is lackluster.  It lacks . . . well, luster."  Yup.

New York Times review of "Curtains", March 23, 2007:

“It’s a perfectly fine life,” he sings, with feeble conviction. “I’d give it” — and here he pauses, for a moment of honest self-assessment — “two cheers.” That’s more or less the feeling inspired by “Curtains.” I sincerely wish I could say otherwise.

My review of "Jack Goes Boating", March 5, 2007:

Hoffman’s character is the richest of the four.

New York Times review of "Jack Goes Boating", March 19, 2007:

But with a wonderful ensemble led by Philip Seymour Hoffman (yes, I know, an Oscar-winning movie star, but never mind), this gentle portrait of pothead losers in love is a reminder of how engrossing uneventful existences can be in the hands of the right actors. You’re likely to leave the theater with a contact high from the ripe pleasure that Mr. Hoffman and his cast mates derive from portraying everyday eccentrics.

My review of "Jack Goes Boating", March 5, 2007:

The play is not deep in terms of meaning, but it would be wrong to dismiss this as a mere "romantic comedy".  All the characters have their own baggage, and their own reasons not to take steps into relationships. 

New York Times review of "Jack Goes Boating", March 19, 2007:

What plot there is hinges on questions classically posed in schlemiel-meets-schlemiel stories. Will Jack and Connie hit it off? Will they make it as a couple? Will they even make it to bed?  You care about the answers because Mr. Glaudini and the cast give such credible life to the people involved, endowing them with quirks and kinks that are a crucial hair’s breadth short of preciousness or cartoonishness.

My review of "Jack Goes Boating", March 5, 2007:

…a nice quiet contemporary comedy/drama that didn’t feel the need to slap you upside the head with zany situations, bizarre characters, or deep messages…

New York Times review of "Jack Goes Boating", March 19, 2007:

“Jack Goes Boating” pushes the same buttons so adroitly manipulated by “Little Miss Sunshine,” last year’s cinematic sleeper hit about a fractious family’s road trip. Like that film “Jack” exudes a wry compassion for the unsung and the life-thwarted that never tips into stickiness…. The entire production — including a set by David Korins that mixes urban realism with redemptive glimpses of lyricism — has an unforced naturalness that keeps shtick at bay.

My review of "Jack Goes Boating", March 5, 2007:

His nervousness is revealed by his almost persistent throat-clearing which starts off so subtle that one might think Hoffman was struggling with a sore throat (well, Cheryl thought that).

New York Times review of "Jack Goes Boating", March 19, 2007:

Character-defining gimmicks that you would expect in a second-tier sitcom, like Jack’s habit of clearing his throat when he’s uncomfortable, seldom feel less than organic here.

* no relation

Death Of Woody Harrelson’s Dad

Ken AshfordHistory, In PassingLeave a Comment

Normally, this is a news story that I would have ignored, save for the fact that Woody Harrelson’s father may have some connection to the JFK assassination.

Below is a picture of the "three tramps" taken into custody in Dallas on that fateful day. 

Tramps

They were supposedly vagrants hanging around the railyards near Dealey Plaza, yet many have noted their relatively clean attire and hair.  The stories vary, but the three men were interviewed (some say arrested and held for several days) by the Dallas Police.  Unfortunately, their names were never recorded, and nobody can say for sure their identities. 

However, many speculate that the middle "tramp" — the tall one — was Charles Harrelson (Woody’s dad) who passed away yesterday.  Charles Harrelson was a hitman at the time, and was in Texas at the time.  Years later, he reportedly admitted (from his jail cell, where he served a life sentence for the murder of a federal judge) that he was involved in the JFK assassination.  But even if he said that, it may be the product of rumors about his involvement, rather than the genesis of them.

In any event, it’s one of the many threads in that piece of Americana known as "JFK conspiracy theory".

Sorkin’s Latest Venture? A Broadway Musical

Ken AshfordPopular CultureLeave a Comment

Aaron Sorkin came to prominence with the play (followed by the movie) "A Few Good Men".  That lead to some of his best work on TV — the cult fave SportsNight (which sadly never found its audience), the widely acclaimed The West Wing (which foundered after Sorkin moved on to other things), and the recent not-as-good-but-getting-better-until-it-was-axed Studio 60.

What’s his next project?

Turning a record album into a Broadway musical.  And not just any musical, but a musical about… well, pink robots?

Broadway will soon get just a bit battier, as Wayne Coyne revealed in a recent interview with EW.com that the Flaming Lips‘ 2002 LP Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots will be transformed into a Broadway musical.

Described Coyne, "There’s the real world and then there’s this fantastical world. This girl, the Yoshimi character, is dying of something. And these two guys are battling to come visit her in the hospital. And as one of the boyfriends envisions trying to save the girl, he enters this other dimension where Yoshimi is this Japanese warrior and the pink robots are an incarnation of her disease. It’s almost like the disease has to win in order for her soul to survive. Or something like that." On Broad-waaaay!

"The West Wing"/"Sports Night" scribe Aaron Sorkin has signed on to script the Yoshimi musical, while director/producer Des McAnuff will guide the production, according to EW.com. "When Des heard the record," said Coyne, "he heard a lot about death and loss and the triumph of your own optimism…he had an emotional attachment to it."

The musical, which may well include other songs from across the Lips’ catalogue, is still far from opening night, but the pink robot cogs have been set in motion.

I’m not familiar with the Flaming Lips’ album, but if Aorkin’s name is attached to this project, I’m all ears.

UPDATE:  Sorkin is currently workshopping his latest play, "The Farnsworth invention", at La Jolla Playhouse in San Diego.  The play, it seems, is about the inventor(s) of television.