Shacking Up Now Legal In North Carolina

Ken AshfordConstitution, Local Interest, Sex/Morality/Family Values3 Comments

201 years ago, North Carolina passed a law (N.C.G.S. § 14‑184) which made it a criminal offense for a man and woman to live together unless they were married.  Specifically, the law says:

If any man and woman, not being married to each other, shall lewdly and lasciviously associate, bed and cohabit together, they shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor.

That archaic law was never taken off the books.

To North Carolina’s credit, it was rarely enforced. 

But in 2004, a 9-1-1 dispatcher with the Pender County Sheriff’s Office named Debora Hobbs was called into her employer’s office and given a choice: marry the man she was currently living with, or be fired from her job.

She went with door number 3, suing her employer’s ass.  The NC Chapter of the ACLU joined in.

Yesterday, State Superior Court Judge Benjamin Alford issued a ruling that the law was unconstitutional on its face and as applied to Hobbs.

From the ACLU press release:

“I am absolutely thrilled with the court’s decision,” said Hobbs. “I just didn’t think it was any of my employer’s business whether I was married or not, as long as I was good at my job, and I am happy that no one else will ever have to be subjected to this law. I couldn’t believe that I was being given this ultimatum to choose between my boyfriend or my livelihood because the Sheriff was enforcing a 201-year-old law that clearly violates my civil rights.”

Jennifer Rudinger, Executive Director of the ACLU of North Carolina, added:

“North Carolina’s cohabitation law is not only patently unconstitutional, but the idea that the government would criminalize people’s choice to live together out of wedlock in this day and age defies logic and common sense.”

It sure does did.

2006 Hurricane Names

Ken AshfordDisasters2 Comments

HurricaneritalgWe’re dealing with Beryl off the East Coast now.

Which one will be the next Katrina?

2006 Hurricane Names

Alberto
Beryl
Chris
Debby
Ernesto
Florence
Gordon
Helene
Isaac
Joyce
Kirk
Leslie
Michael
Nadine
Oscar
Patty
Rafael
Sandy
Tony
Valerie
William

I can’t help but noticing that "Debby" is on the list.  Since I am going to be in a production of "Debbie Does Dallas" in late August (see sidebar at right), I’m wondering if the two events will coincide.  Not that I actually want a hurricane named Debbie to strike Texas at that time (or any time), but it would be — well — kinda good publicity if timed right.

But my money is on Florence.  "Florence" just sounds like a bad-ass hurricane.  "Helene", too.

Heckuva Constitutional Infringement, FEMA.

Ken AshfordConstitution, DisastersLeave a Comment

I had to read this two or three times to make sure I was getting it right:

Residents of trailer parks set up by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to house hurricane victims in Louisiana aren’t allowed to talk to the press without an official escort, The (Baton Rouge) Advocate reported.

In one instance, a security guard ordered an Advocate reporter out of a trailer during an interview in Morgan City. Similar FEMA rules were enforced in Davant, in Plaquemines Parish.

FEMA spokeswoman Rachel Rodi wouldn’t say whether the security guards’ actions complied with FEMA policy, saying the matter was being reviewed. But she confirmed that FEMA does not allow the news media to speak alone to residents in their trailers.

"If a resident invites the media to the trailer, they have to be escorted by a FEMA representative who sits in on the interview," Rodi told the newspaper for its July 15 report. "That’s just a policy."

A policy?  It’s a violation of the First Amendment.  Actually, it violates two parts of the First Amendment: freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

These Katrina victims lost their homes.  They lost their homes and are now living in trailer parks — not internment camps.  They can talk to whomever they please on any subject they please, and the government cannot monitor or prohibit any conversation.

Very bizarre.

Earth Orbit Unaffected, No Thanks To You

Ken AshfordScience & TechnologyLeave a Comment

In case you missed it (I know I did), today was World Jump Day. 

An organization of people with nothing better to do decided to get everybody in the western hemisphere to jump at the same time, in an effort to see if the simultaneous impact of 600 million pairs of feet would shift the planet’s orbit. (For obvious reasons, this wouldn’t work if the entire planet’s population jumped at the same time, since the impact of mass jumping in the Eastern hemisphere would offset that of the Western hemisphere, and Earth’s orbit would remain constant — this is high science, don’t you know.)

Worldjumpday

The jump was scheduled for July 20, 2006 (today) at 11:39.13 UTC (Greenwich Mean Time), which translates to 7:39.13 a.m. Eastern Standard Time.

I’m no astronomer, but looking out the window, it doesn’t look like the Earth’s orbit has gone askew.

And it’s YOUR fault, because YOU didn’t participate.

Patti Davis On Bush’s Veto

Ken AshfordHealth Care1 Comment

Within an hour after Bush vetoed legislation barring federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, Patti Davis responds in an editorial entitled "Does Anyone Care?"

On Wednesday, President Bush handed down his first veto ever, for a bill that would have allowed federal funding for stem-cell research on embryos left over after in vitro fertilization procedures—embryos that would otherwise be destroyed. The bill passed both the Republican-controlled House and the Senate, although it fell several votes short of the number needed to override a presidential veto.

The veto comes as no surprise; that battle line was drawn years ago. But it’s hard to believe that the 70 percent of Americans who support stem-cell research really care what President Bush does. I’m not suggesting they won’t notice, or be bothered—even annoyed. I’m certainly not suggesting that federal funding couldn’t move research along at a faster pace. But caring is an emotion of a deeper kind. When we truly care about another’s opinion, it’s because we value that person and hold in some esteem their judgments and pronouncements. It also might mean we believe that individual can influence the tide of the future with their opinions.

This is a president who has no currency left with the majority of Americans who, polls have shown, do not trust him. We won’t totally shrug off his intransigence, but we won’t waste too much time mulling over his reasons either. Why? Because we don’t care.

White House Press Secretary Tony Snow said, about the impending veto, that President Bush “thinks murder is wrong.” But apparently, the destruction of fertilized eggs—flushed away as if they’re useless—doesn’t count as murder. Only using those fertilized eggs for valuable scientific research that could eventually save people’s lives counts as murder in this president’s mind. No one in this administration, with all their wordplay and posturing, has been able to dance around that stunning lack of logic.

We are being asked to believe that this president’s opposition to embryonic stem-cell research has deep moral, religious and ethical roots. As we heard, the word “murder” is tossed around freely.

Yet this is a president who led us into a war with a patchwork quilt of lies. Thousands of American soldiers have died. Thousands more have returned horribly wounded, and we don’t even know yet what toll posttraumatic stress disorder will take on those who obeyed their commander in chief and went to fight in Iraq. We may never know the complete death toll of Iraqi citizens, but we certainly know that some were raped and brutally executed. There have been many beheadings, sometimes of Americans who simply went to Iraq to help the people there, not to fight. Let us please not forget 26-year-old Nick Berg who was beheaded in May 2004. Where is President Bush’s grief over all those deaths? He directs his moral outrage instead to the idea of using fertilized eggs, that would otherwise be destroyed, for potentially life-saving scientific research. He tells us it’s because he cares so deeply about life.

Where was his care in the aftermath of Katrina? This president, when he finally did touch down in Louisiana, made a smirking remark about the good times he used to have in New Orleans. As if alluding to his hard-partying past was appropriate while people were suffering and dying in the Superdome, while bodies were lying bloated in the streets.

We won’t care about this veto because we don’t really believe this president cares about us. Stem-cell research is going to go forward, obviously without this administration’s help. People like Bill Gates and Warren Buffet have shown us that there is some serious money in this country and there are dedicated, humane citizens willing to put their money where their beliefs are. If anything, President Bush’s veto of the stem-cell bill may galvanize people even more.

The future of this scientific research doesn’t rest in the world of politics, but rather in the committed hearts of people who long to see diseases like Parkinson’s and diabetes, possibly even Alzheimer’s, become treatable conditions. People who believe that the day will come when victims of spinal cord injuries will stand up from their wheelchairs and walk again. People who trust the scientists who are working so passionately on what will be, and already is, the next frontier of medicine.

No president can veto the will of people’s hearts.

Why Bloggers Blog

Ken AshfordBlogging1 Comment

Pew survey:

  • 54% of bloggers say that they have never published their writing or media creations anywhere else; 44% say they have published elsewhere.
  • 54% of bloggers are under the age of 30.
  • Women and men have statistical parity in the blogosphere, with women representing 46% of bloggers and men 54%.
  • 76% of bloggers say a reason they blog is to document their personal experiences and share them with others.
  • 64% of bloggers say a reason they blog is to share practical knowledge or skills with others.
  • When asked to choose one main subject, 37% of bloggers say that the primary topic of their blog is "my life and experiences."
  • Other topics ran distantly behind: 11% of bloggers focus on politics and government; 7% focus on entertainment; 6% focus on sports; 5% focus on general news and current events; 5% focus on business; 4% on technology; 2% on religion, spirituality or faith; and additional smaller groups who focus on a specific hobby, a health problem or illness, or other topics.
  • Is Michael Brown In Charge If Lebanon Evacuation?

    Ken AshfordMiddle EastLeave a Comment

    There were roughly 25,000 Americans in Lebanon when the bombs began.  A couple thou have been evacuated so far. What about the rest?

    "We have an open line to all American citizens. We’re in touch with them by Web site. Those Americans who wish to leave will obviously go out," [Nicholas Burns, the U.S. undersecretary of state for political affairs] told CNN Tuesday.

    Problem there, Nick.  Telephone service is spotty — both land lines and cellular networks are on-again, off-again in war-struck areas. Electricity is out in parts of Beirut and southern Lebanon, probably as a result of Israeli bombing runs which targeted civilian infrastructure, including power plants and transformers.

    Anyway, those still awaiting evacuation don’t seem to feel very informed by our government:

    "We are desperately trying to evacuate and have become more and more disappointed and angry with the way the evacuation is being handled," said Lina Fleihan of Greensboro, North Carolina. "We hear more about what’s going on from CNN than we do from the U.S. government and the American Embassy here."

    “Debbie Does Dallas: The Musical” Rehearsal Quotes Of The Day

    Ken AshfordRandom MusingsLeave a Comment

    I think I might make this a quasi-daily feature for a while.  Maybe even compile them in the sidebar to the right. 

    I was thinking that some of the humor of these quotes might be too "inside", but actually, some of these quotes are even funnier out of context.

    "Yeah.  All the guys wrestle each other.  It’s, like, homoerotic, I guess."  — David Joy [cast member]

    "Oh, shit.  I have to have an orgasm."  — Cheryl Roberts [cast member], upon listening to the original cast CD.

    "Did I hurt you?"

    "C’mon!  Take one for the team!" — Cast member to fellow cast member whenever the latter is about to take part in an embarrassing scene [used frequently]

    Previous quotes

    The Only Argument You Need To Know About Embryonic Stem Cells

    Ken AshfordHealth CareLeave a Comment

    From Ezra Klein:

    Embryonic Stem Cell lines come from material stored at fertility clinics which is already slated for destruction. Preventing these blastocysts from being used for research won’t ‘save’ them. It simply means they’ll be disposed of in a medical waste facility instead of being used to find cures for disease. The only reason to restrict federal approval of new lines is to appeal to a minority of extremist social conservatives and it comes at the cost of possibly delaying or denying treatment–and in some cases life itself–to millions of people.

    Understand that graf, as no single point is more important in the moral argument: these blastocysts would be destroyed anyway. Not a single life is spared, or saved, in the barring of stem cell research. But in delaying possible cures and treatments, an untold number will be lost.

    Now, if you consider yourself a member of the "party of life", where else can you come down on this issue other than supporting embryonic stem cell research?

    Heck, and if facts don’t convince you about the prudence of using stem cells to cure disease, how about celebrity endorsements?  I mean, are you really going to disagree with Mary Tyler Moore?

    “Bring ‘Em On” — Three Years Later

    Ken AshfordIraq2 Comments

    "There are some who feel like — that the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is, bring ’em on. We’ve got the force necessary to deal with the security situation."

    George W. Bush
    Press Conference
    July 2, 2003

    More than 14,000 civilians have been killed in Iraq in the first half of this year, an ominous figure reflecting the fact that "killings, kidnappings and torture remain widespread" in the war-torn country, a United Nations report says.

    Killings of civilians are on "an upward trend," with more than 5,800 deaths and more than 5,700 injuries reported in May and June alone, it says.

    CNN
    U.N.: 14,000 Iraqis killed in 2006
    July 18, 2006

    [Hat tip: Billmon]

    Conservatives Having Bad Times

    Ken AshfordRepublicans1 Comment

    Data point:  According to WaPo, conservatives feel Bush is AWOL on foreign policy.

    Data point:  As posted earlier, the constitutional amendment banning gay marriage fails to pass the House.

    Data point:  Meanwhile, the darling of the conservative christian movement, Ralph Reed, loses to a virtual unknown in Georgia.

    Data point:  It’s generally agreed that Bush’s expected veto of embryonic stem cell research is a political loser, since most Americans would like to find cures for cancer, Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s (the disease that laid waste to Ronald Reagan).

    Data point:  And in Alabama — that’s Alabama, folks — they’re about to elect their first openly day gay legislator.

    Have things turned a corner?

    Taxi Drivers Strike Again

    Ken AshfordRight Wing Punditry/IdiocyLeave a Comment

    It always amuses me how conservative pundit often invoke their personal conversations with taxi drivers as support for their positions.

    You know, as in . . . "I was talking to a taxi driver the other day, and he told me that he thinks that Iraq must have had weapons of mass destruction, and they are now in Syria."

    Therefore (the reader is supposed to think) the conservative pundit is correct in his viewpoint, and has the pulse of the people behind him — all because a taxi driver believes the same thing as a pundit.

    John Hindrocket is at it again:

    But I was struck at the time by the fact that several taxi drivers told me they had soured on the Republicans because of "stem cells." The Republicans never regained their momentum (or their approval ratings) after the missteps of early 2005.

    What does this guy do?  Ride around in cabs all day discussing stem cells with the drivers?